2008 Woodie Awards
Keep an eye out for Obama
Staff Editorial
Issue date: 2/22/07 Section: Opinion
- Page 1 of 2 next >
The premature debate over the future president of the United States has already spread across the nation. Although this hype is happening historically much earlier than it has in the past, in a way it is warranted.
We are presented with an incredibly diverse and interesting array of potential candidates: A republican from Colorado with a platform dominated by immigration issues; a senator from New York, who is a political warhorse and the wife of a former president; the former mayor of New York City; and a relatively young and inexperienced democrat from Chicago.
It is this last candidate who has critics and fans buzzing with excitement. He is Barack Obama, and whether or not you like him, you ought to have an opinion on him.
Without giving our overall support to him as a candidate, we at the Rip would like to raise awareness about this interesting candidate.
The next president must have a clear vision for Iraq and for the war on terror in general. Without being pessimistic, the next president must be as honest and pragmatic as possible about the conflicts we have been forced into, and those we have forced ourselves into.
While Obama has made clear his dissenting views about Iraq, he has shown himself to be an informed critical thinker.
In a political environment where a candidate must make a firm stance on an issue to present to the voter, Obama has shown that he is a capable listener and considers without being wishy-washy.
In any situation as complicated as a war, there is no hard and short answer, and there is no simple solution. "Stay the course" or "cut and run" are terms that are offensive to any thinking person's intelligence when presented as the only options for a war in the Middle East.
While Obama has made it clear that he does not support the war in Iraq, he undoubtedly has a more intricate solution than simply pulling all the troops out of the region. Or at least he is still thinking about it.
The fact that he is still so new to the whole political scene has been debated hotly, with both sides of the debate claiming superiority. Those who oppose him claim that he is untested and unskilled. His supporters claim that his newness is an asset that will set him apart from those jaded and corrupted by the whole political atmosphere.
We are presented with an incredibly diverse and interesting array of potential candidates: A republican from Colorado with a platform dominated by immigration issues; a senator from New York, who is a political warhorse and the wife of a former president; the former mayor of New York City; and a relatively young and inexperienced democrat from Chicago.
It is this last candidate who has critics and fans buzzing with excitement. He is Barack Obama, and whether or not you like him, you ought to have an opinion on him.
Without giving our overall support to him as a candidate, we at the Rip would like to raise awareness about this interesting candidate.
The next president must have a clear vision for Iraq and for the war on terror in general. Without being pessimistic, the next president must be as honest and pragmatic as possible about the conflicts we have been forced into, and those we have forced ourselves into.
While Obama has made clear his dissenting views about Iraq, he has shown himself to be an informed critical thinker.
In a political environment where a candidate must make a firm stance on an issue to present to the voter, Obama has shown that he is a capable listener and considers without being wishy-washy.
In any situation as complicated as a war, there is no hard and short answer, and there is no simple solution. "Stay the course" or "cut and run" are terms that are offensive to any thinking person's intelligence when presented as the only options for a war in the Middle East.
While Obama has made it clear that he does not support the war in Iraq, he undoubtedly has a more intricate solution than simply pulling all the troops out of the region. Or at least he is still thinking about it.
The fact that he is still so new to the whole political scene has been debated hotly, with both sides of the debate claiming superiority. Those who oppose him claim that he is untested and unskilled. His supporters claim that his newness is an asset that will set him apart from those jaded and corrupted by the whole political atmosphere.
Be the first to comment on this story